Summary Responce #2
Summary
An article of Imaginary cities by the author Dunu Roy (2005) tells us arguments between human rights to live and the law for slum clearance in Mumbai India. The author discussed whether the verdict was common to the nature of public interest or not, and how the Court regarded the verdict. The author suggests six topics for this problem. They are Urban appraisal, City planning trends, Crucial questions, Polemics of urban, City’s expansion, Master Plan draft. In third topics the author suggest three indicaion they are (a)”Large sections of the urban poor habitation have been forcefully taken over by every” government, (b)”The occupational space that they occupied is being transferred into larger private corporate entilies such as commercial complexes and residential layouts”(c)”While the driving force behind these changes is manifestly the new globalised economy ,it is offered on an environment platter of “cleanliness” and”beautification” (all threes quotes are on10 paragraph of article).
Response
I agree with author’s concern because we should regard law itself for human use. In general we should keep law. Some law government and company used the law for getting poor people out from slum area. I believe they should not do “beautiflication” policy instead of providing social service for them. India’s government should make more Community development policy and try to improve living standard of poor people.
I think it is difficult to improve the slum problem without the social service and providing and providing job opportunity and education. India’s government hope to develop like Singapore. However without community development they will not be able to find the solution for the roots of problem.
An article of Imaginary cities by the author Dunu Roy (2005) tells us arguments between human rights to live and the law for slum clearance in Mumbai India. The author discussed whether the verdict was common to the nature of public interest or not, and how the Court regarded the verdict. The author suggests six topics for this problem. They are Urban appraisal, City planning trends, Crucial questions, Polemics of urban, City’s expansion, Master Plan draft. In third topics the author suggest three indicaion they are (a)”Large sections of the urban poor habitation have been forcefully taken over by every” government, (b)”The occupational space that they occupied is being transferred into larger private corporate entilies such as commercial complexes and residential layouts”(c)”While the driving force behind these changes is manifestly the new globalised economy ,it is offered on an environment platter of “cleanliness” and”beautification” (all threes quotes are on10 paragraph of article).
Response
I agree with author’s concern because we should regard law itself for human use. In general we should keep law. Some law government and company used the law for getting poor people out from slum area. I believe they should not do “beautiflication” policy instead of providing social service for them. India’s government should make more Community development policy and try to improve living standard of poor people.
I think it is difficult to improve the slum problem without the social service and providing and providing job opportunity and education. India’s government hope to develop like Singapore. However without community development they will not be able to find the solution for the roots of problem.
posted by DaisukeYabuki | 7:10 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home